The councilor Luigi Bove, an independent center, spoke on 'process Publication of 'expectations for the preparation of the City Urban Planning and raises a number of issues, attacking the procedures undertaken by the Government Farina "The' process' s expectations of the plan Puc started so bad. Too much confusion, little publicity. First, I agree that a notice to the 'expectations of writing Puc - Plan zoning strategic environmental assessment and sound-card of' agricultural use of land in the middle of summer 'is not a good choice. Indeed, the judge politically wrong and wicked. At present there are two resolutions on Puc; the first, 143 of July 11 which approves the specification and are expected well € 310,000 for the preparation of the plan and then the n 150 of 31 July in which to rectify some scores as criteria for the award. " Bove goes on in and says' the process has gone wrong, are legitimate questions: why so much accuracy in the preparation of documents? Why do the 'warning in early July, corrected to 31 and not giving adequate publicity to the same? And let me explain: first, the changes made in the second act to be an impact on publication of the first act? And then, in the town of Maddaloni, there is a manifest public about the 'alert' s expectations. The ban will expire Sept. 18 but already most of the time is exhausted and there is a poster around. To be noted that other municipalities for the same topic, held open the call for several more days, since the Official Journal is written that the 'notice was sent only on August 1. All 'roll hall of the municipality, until last Thursday, there was only the first page of Resolution No. 150 of July 31 and then only of' object of change, or rather of corrections. The technicians, professionals interested in the contract, must make a lot 'of research. Moreover, while the 'notice was published in the Official Gazette No. 93, August 11, August 11 and I stress, because there is no trace in the Official Bulletin Region of Campania?. Again, the specification of the race is too selective and explain: as a criterion is added that those making the request must submit a total turnover, for services provided and in the last three years, which must be at least equal to the d 'contract . Those who fail to meet this criterion? Maybe a few technicians, as the basis of contract is well 310 000 €. I would like also hear from the 'center-city administration, another aspect in the decision of July 31 it is written that is allocated € 10,000 for the publication of' opinion, on four newspapers in two national and two local. What are they? I read the newspapers every day premises. I've never seen this warning. I missed or has not been published yet? And when it is published, since almost 18 days between the contract expires? And why on the home page of the town there is only a small correction to the text of the expiry of the notice and there is no direct connection with the notice, the specification rather than the need to strut and look for announcements in the races. As if it were a call any. In short, the 'process is started on the wrong foot. Because in the middle of summer? Because the advertising ban is so weak?. We are not at all "
0 comments:
Post a Comment